Assessment criteria
After submitting your CDS model, the jury will start assessing your submission. The criteria that the jury will assess are presented below. The maximum amount of points is 7.5.
| Criteria name | Criteria description | Maximum amount of points |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical relevance | Your CDS application shall be based on international, national, or regional clinical practice guidelines. | 1 point |
| Quality on clinical models description | When creating your clinical models, you need to add meta-data as described in the tutorials. Clarity and correctness of the meta-data is important when creating a CDS application. | 1 point |
| Language | English is a prerequisite. However, we encourage additional languages. Additional languages can give up to an extra half point. | 1.5 points (correct English gives 1 point and additional languages can give up to 0.5 points) |
| Design of the CDS application | Having a good structure and design when building your CDS application is important. Furthermore we encourage reuse of existing archetypes as the building blocks of your CDS application. | 1 point (whereas 0.5 of these points are only to be provided in case of good reusability of existing archetypes) |
| Correctness of CDS application logic | Your CDS application shall perform calculations and other logic correctly. | 1 point |
| Test coverage of the guideline logic | In the Guideline Editor, there is one tab for creating tests for your guideline. We require at least 3 test cases. (See tutorials for more information). | 1 point |
| Complexity of the CDS application | CDS applications vary in their complexity, a CDS application with a higher complexity level will be provided with more points. | 1 point |
